valzhang: (tgchk)
2025-12-21 08:47 pm

Reading thoughts: the Shards

Okay, this is a bit overdue because as I mentioned in my day log I actually finished this book a few days ago. But it took me a while to start this because every time I thought about it I just didn't know where to start, there was so much, and even now I still don't know. But let me try LOL.

This book was fucking bananas. The narrator, who is Bret Easton Ellis himself, is just so damn interesting. I love his writing style, or perhaps that's just his personality, or maybe it's both, but reading it is so easy because of how fascinating he is. Every time I picked up this book I went into a trance. The writing is kind of cut-and-dry, not really emotional in the typical sense (I've heard this is pretty much Ellis' modus operandi), but somehow it still teemed with character because of how much we were inside Bret's head. It's very intimate, perhaps is the best way to describe it. Even though Bret is such an unreliable narrator it makes you feel like you know every detail of his thoughts.

A wave of lust crested hard in my chest and I suddenly ached for him—the sensation was so immediate and so tidal that I was shocked—and adding this new presence to the anticipation of watching that movie that was finally about to begin forced me to slow down my breathing. The boy aroused something primal in me that I had never felt before—I wanted him immediately, I needed to be his friend, I had to make contact, I had to see him naked, I had to own him.

It wasn't just the characterization though, it was also just the way the writing was on a sentence level. The vocabulary, the flow of the words, the way every sentence was formatted, it all felt so natural when it had to be natural and jarring and exciting when it had to be jarring and exciting. Again, it makes it so easy to read, you just fly through it because of how well it all flows. Maybe it's more of a personal taste thing? But I loved it. I'll even say that it kind of made me crazy jealous because I knew I would never be able to write like that no matter how hard I try.

Back to Bret though, he was a very frustrating and upsetting protagonist at times, but in other times he was also relatable. His vastly different identities—the tortured artist, the writer, versus the tangible participant—is pretty much what the story is about. His paranoia in relation to the killings and Robert Mallory and his paranoia in being discovered as gay are not separate things, they are linked, symbiotic even, and it's painful but also seriously fun to read how this paranoia takes over him and his life.

I didn't let it bother me—I might have fallen in love with him but there was no way for this to happen, to actualize itself in this particular time and place, in the atmosphere at Buckley, in high school, in 1981, so fuck it, go with the counter-narrative. Who cared anyway? It was all bullshit. It felt so cleansing to look at things from this angle. I wanted to be where Susan Reynolds was. And I wanted to write like this as well: numbness as a feeling, numbness as a motivation, numbness as the reason to exist, numbness as ecstasy.

And there is so much atmosphere in this book. Like sooo much it almost suffocates you. I thought I'd read atmospheric books before, it's nothing compared to this. Of course this is due in part to the book's tendency to name every single thing and constantly reference. Songs, artists, brands, street names, by God there are a lot of street names. And I definitely understand why people find this annoying, but at the same time I kind of enjoyed it. Especially as someone who a) is Gen-Z and b) has never been to America before, it was fun to see into this completely unfamiliar world with such intensity. I felt plunged into this book's setting.

Another part of the atmosphere-building were of course the characters and their relationships to each other. They are so terrible and interesting and I love them. Again people say this novel is too long but I don't agree, I think all the scenes, even the "useless" ones, just add more depth and more tension to this fucked-up friend group.

This novel is so good at making every conversation feel like I'm about to get murdered. The characters are almost never talking about what they're talking about; there's always some double-meaning, or something they're trying to say subliminally, skirting around the issue pretending everything is normal. And it rounds out the whole theme of the book, the pretense. The overwhelming fear that crushes Bret at all times makes every conversation feel high-stakes even when on the surface it's about nothing.

'Please, Susan,' I said softly. 'Don't worry. He's gone. Robert's gone. He can't hurt you anymore.'


Susan turned back to me, trembling violently now. I was gripping her hand so tightly she couldn't pull away.


'Is my secret safe with you?' I asked softly. 'Is my secret safe with you?' I whispered again.


I was squeezing her hand with such force that I could feel it begin to snap apart—I kept crushing it while telling her in a soothing voice, 'He's gone, Robert's gone, it's all going to be okay, you're safe,' until I heard something in her hand breaking.

And the horror bits are appropriately horrific. There were moments where I felt genuinely sick and moments where my jaw was just gaping, but at the same time, they're not so overwhelming as to feel gratuitous or unnecessary. (I know this is one of Ellis' least violent books.) I couldn't look away, it pulled me in, I just kept reading and reading and reading even when I was terribly grossed out. I think it adds so much to put you in Bret's head and experience the fear and dread he's experiencing.

The ending is not necessarily open, it's technically wrapped up, but the events of the story itself are so ambiguous. I'll admit, at first, it left me feeling a little empty. There was no one moment where it clicked and I had an epiphany about everything in the novel. If I wrote this post just an hour after finishing I might have rated it a bit lower because the ending didn't feel so neatly tied in a bow like I had expected it to be.

But the more I think about it, the more I love it. I love going back to certain scenes and thinking about how absolutely nuts Bret is being, how paranoid he is, how sometimes he seems so correct but maybe his friends are right, maybe it's just his writerly instincts to embellish situations and see things that aren't there. He is such a well written unreliable narrator because he makes so much sense all the time and I believed him too, but he's also. Insufferable. My misgivings were all erased once I stopped thinking even subconsciously of this novel as a mystery, it's not a mystery, it's not even really about the killings. It's a character study and it's a really good one!

'I tried to help him he killed himself he was my friend I loved him I loved him I tried to save him he attacked two of my friends earlier he jumped he jumped.' I was being lifted up. 'He trapped me in the apartment I thought he was going to kill me.' Paramedics placed me on a stretcher, my face was wiped clean, and an oxygen mask covered my nose and mouth. I was wheeled through the apartment and then was carried down in the elevator. I saw the vaulted ceiling of the lobby as I kept ranting even though no one could hear me through the oxygen mask. 'He killed those girls he killed Debbie he attacked Susan he told me to come he needed me he attacked me he tried to kill me before he jumped I loved him I loved him.' I was pleading to anyone who was listening.

If there's one thing I could complain about in this novel, it's that I wish there had been more Susan. She is such a central character, and Bret is so enamored with her, and yet I felt like I didn't get my fill of her. I know that this is likely on purpose because Susan is the embodiment of the numbness that Bret strives for, she becomes increasingly colder and more distant as if she lives on an entirely different plane, but I really think I would've liked it if she had more scenes. In the present of the story yes, but I also would've liked to see moments between her and Bret pre-1981. You know, just sweet stuff of them together. I feel like it would've made the fate of their relationship in the end hit so much harder. As it is, their connection didn't feel as overwhelmingly present in the story as I would've liked.

That's pretty much my only nitpick. Other than that, I loved the Shards. It was a rollercoaster, it was nauseating, it was funny, it was relatable, it was sad and shocking and horny and weird and fun. Everything I want out of a book really! The themes of obsession, of homophobia and hiding who you are, the inherent performance of being a person. All to set the tableau of two mentally ill guys slashing the shit out of each other. Beautiful.

I hesitate to give books I just read a 10/10 right away; I'll wait until my next reading log to decide for sure what I think. But this is definitely as close as it gets!

...and I had seen so many instances even before Robert Mallory entered our lives: pulling a hand away, an unfinished kiss, the Icehouse song, the bikini in the supermarket—these had been clues emerging within a widening puzzle. The sadness I felt was tied to Thom's impending pain and it was something I didn't want to process: Thom didn't deserve this. But then, I thought, as the fear started overriding my sadness: who deserved anything? We get what we get.
valzhang: (makimaaa)
2025-12-17 08:26 pm

Reading thoughts: Contemplation, the Judgment, and more

I finished reading Kafka's collection last night. None of them measured up to the Metamorphosis—no wonder it's his most famous work—but I still enjoyed all of them greatly, some more than others. Since they're all short stories and poem collections, I'll just do them all in one post. (Especially before I get too sucked into Bret Easton Ellis' The Shards and ostensibly forget about every other piece of literature I've ever read.)

Contemplation: I felt a little frustrated at first because this collection lacks pretty much any kind of story or narrative. Once I began looking at it as just poems I liked them a lot more. It's a nice way to appreciate Kafka's writing style; they feel imaginative and observant, as if you're presented with a world as it is. I especially like 'The Businessman' and 'Being Unhappy'. That being said, I really do prefer his stories over his poems. 7/10.

the Judgment: This one is such an interesting look at a father-son dynamic and only gets more crazy to think about in regards to Kafka's own relationship with his father. While a lot of his works are in some sense very autobiographical this one feels the most direct, the most intrusive. There are probably other things about this book that people more intelligent than me can derive, like its concept of judgment, but definitely what I liked most was just the window into a complicated parental relationship. It feels very real that a son who takes care of his father and seems like a perfectly good man is endlessly criticized by said father, and in the end submits himself to that 'judgment'. 7.5/10.

the Stoker: I feel... as if I'm not allowed to rate this yet. It's just one chapter of the unfinished novel Amerika, sadly not in the book but which I definitely plan on reading because I did like this one as well. The titular stoker is a very Kafkaesque character, downtrodden, mistreated, ignored by everybody, even if Karl is the protagonist. And the characters were fun. Again I did like this but I don't want to say anything about it definitely before I read Amerika.

In the Penal Colony: I loved this one, my second favourite work in the whole book. It's so gruesome but it doesn't feel scary (and Kafka is well capable of writing horror), it just feels very fascinating and almost dreamy. I know most people interpret this one religiously but I appreciate the dichotomy of tradition/modernity in itself and I think it's one of those things that will always feel relevant. The character of the officer seems to me almost romantic, the epitome of the old world loyalist, surrendering himself to his own worshipped style of execution when he failed to convince the dignitary just as a soldier kills himself when he knows a war has been lost (even if he didn't get to have it in the end). I don't know, but it just really resonated with me. Also the subplot of the condemned man and the soldier becoming friends was funny as hell. 9/10!

"How we watched the transfiguration in the tormented faces, how we held our cheeks in the glow of this arduously achieved and already passing justice! I tell you, comrade, those were times!"

A Country Doctor (collection): A little similar to Contemplation in nature, though certainly with a more understandable flow of events, veering more toward 'story' territory than poems. Though some of them are equally as nonsensical and bizarre. There were some I didn't care for but some I found really interesting, and I think it would be different for everybody.

The story the collection derives its title from, A Country Doctor, made no sense to me at all. I had to search it up to see what other people thought (something I hate doing before I've come to an opinion myself). But I was glad to see everyone else is as confused as I am xD. I think there's a lot to be said about doctors and expectations, I suppose. But mostly I just think the vibe of the story is so haunting. This is definitely the one that creeped me out the most.

Other stories I liked from here are 'An Old Journal' and 'Before the Law'. Overall, 7.5/10.

A Hunger Artist (collection): All of the ones in here are good, but my definite favourite was the story A Hunger Artist itself. Another one of Kafka's more famous works and I understand why. It's very revealing how he thought of himself and what he saw as his dying art—literature—and perhaps how he devoted himself to it to the point of ascetism and religion almost. Josefine is also about an artist's relationship to art and audience but I found it less compelling.

First Sorrow may also seem to be about artist and art, though a rather unconventional one (a trapeze artist). I wonder if it's about the changing whims of artists and how much they seem to fear mundanity, or strive for originality, another higher level of their craft. Or maybe I'm reaching. Never know with these to be honest.

Again, I liked all of them. Like I said, I love the stories more than his shorter stuff, so this gets an 8/10 from me.

There were three other stories in the appendix. Two of them were okay (Great Noise and The Coal-Scuttle Rider) but the other is the one work I straight-up disliked (Aeroplanes in Brescia). I could not bring myself to like it. Even the dreamy characteristic writing style of Kafka does not come through in that one, it's painfully literal which is not something I enjoyed at all. I think my eyes glazed over reading it.

Other than that! I had a great time reading this collection. I do think the experience is a hundred times enriched if you go through the trouble of learning a bit about Kafka and his personal life, since so many of these stories seem more intimate that way. But the uniqueness and creativity are distinct in both writing style and in the stories and character themselves; it left me with the strong feeling of Oh, I understand now why people call things 'Kafkaesque'. It's just such a... peculiar type of vibe. I really liked it.

I'll be honest, when it comes to reading, I usually appreciate a directness and logic. So these works, in all their bizarreness, were a little challenging for me, but not in a bad way. They really forced me to slow down and think, and God knows I probably don't do that enough.

Overall, a strong 8.5/10.

"'Am I supposed to be happy with that as an apology? I suppose it's all I'm going to get. I always have to take what I'm given. I came into the world with a lovely wound; that was my entire outfitting.'
valzhang: (makimaaa)
2025-12-14 12:16 am

Reading thoughts: the Metamorphosis

I read this story a long time ago, I reckon when my brain had hardly been formed. Ten years old? Eleven? I retained the general plot, but forgot all about the rest. So when I failed to find Hamlet at the bookstore, I thought I'd pick up a Kafka collection and experience this for the first time again.

What I wasn't ready for is how extremely, heartachingly sad this story is. There were so many parts where I got close to crying, and so many parts where I actually did shed a few tears. The third person narration of Gregor rends your heart apart. His love for his family radiates through every single word and to see it met with callousness, cruelty, and fear is awful. This is an awful awful book in the best way possible.

"'Help, oh please God, help me!', inclined her head as though for a better view of Gregor, but then, quite at variance with that, ran senselessly away from him; she forgot the breakfast table was behind her, on reaching it, she hurriedly, in her distractedness, sat down on it, seeming oblivious to the fact that coffee was gushing all over the carpet from the large upset coffee pot.


"'Mother, mother,' Gregor said softly, looking up at her."


It's through this sadness that we properly glean what the story is unsubtly trying to say about capitalism. In his family where he is the sole provider and the rest of his family is content to take from him (and which he is content to provide because he loves them so much), Gregor is only seen as their means of survival, their cash cow. He worked day in and day out, a corporate slave while his healthy father and mother did nothing. And the very first time he was late to work, all they cared about was getting him there, because to them that was all he was and all he lived to do. Which is also a view shared by Gregor himself, no doubt shaped by the world they lived in. He turned into a literal insect (I know the original simply used the word 'vermin', but my copy straight up translates it as 'cockroach') and his first thought was "How am I going to get to work?" How visceral and terrible.

There are just so many things about this. The way his sister initially wanted to take away his furniture because she saw he enjoyed crawling over the walls; but as time passed and she started caring less and less, she was fine with everyone shoving unwanted furniture and junk into his room. Every act of kindness from her is bittersweet in the way that she is trying to care, but she can't even bring herself to look at him or come close to him, her brother, her brother who had loved her so much he was going to pay to send her to the conservatory. Because he was the only one who cared about her music passion. Her parents don't, the later tenants don't, but after so long in isolation Gregor came out just to hear her play. Grete is not hateable like her parents or the other characters, especially considering she's a child, but she too lapses into hating Gregor by the end. Their relationship stabbed me all throughout this book.

Not to mention his father, throwing apples at him, and one of it literally embedding itself into his flesh. He can't move around freely or crawl anymore, one of his few pleasures taken away from him. And later on his father gets angry at his lumbering movements when it was his violence that had caused it in the first place. He laments saying that Gregor can't understand them, even though he very much can, and it's the family that never attempted to understand him.

All this embeds itself in Gregor just like the apple. The descriptions of his self-hatred were so real. He had done no crime, had never intended to hurt anyone, and yet everyone including himself hated him like he had. When his father was a useless financial burden, the rest of the family was quick to love him and be affectionate over him. But when it was Gregor's turn to be taken care of unconditionally, he was turned away, and he thinks it's his fault for the sin of existing.

And the end where he dies and his family practically rejoices, moves away, starts a new life that's better and warmer, as if the universe itself is celebrating Gregor's death. They're so much happier without him, and it's horrible. I genuinely had a pit in my stomach by the end of this story. You just don't stop feeling for Gregor. He worked and when he stopped working, he was unloved and died.

The writing style is great. Easy to understand, but no less detailed for it. Some of the descriptions of Gregor's new body were very vivid. It's dry, which fits Gregor's characterization as a man who had dedicated his life to working and providing. But despite its unfeeling style of prose, you can feel the emotion very clearly. Just like how Gregor, despite now being mostly unable to show it in a way his family can understand, still felt very strongly. He was in a cockroach's body, but his human emotions are overwhelming in the narrative.

This is short, around 60 pages. But in those 60 pages this story makes you feel for and understand Gregor, the dynamics of his family, and how capitalism indelibly ruins our lives and our human connections. 9.5/10, maybe just straight-up a 10.

"And yet his sister was playing so beautifully. Her face was inclined to the side, and sadly and searchingly her eyes followed the columns of notes. Gregor crept a little closer and held his head close to the ground, so as to be prepared to meet her gaze. Could he be an animal, to be so moved by music?"
valzhang: (vox)
2025-12-13 03:24 am

Reading thoughts: Bored Gay Werewolf

This is the book I've been hankering after for a few days now. Partly because it seemed to me very Frankcore, yes, I will admit... but also partly because I just love werewolves and shapeshifting, especially as allegories for queerness. So I picked it up and blasted through it in a few hours and I enjoyed it! But I'm also a bit disappointed.

First of all, the themes are not subtle. Toxic masculinity, the importance of emotional vulnerability, the sense of not belonging, upper class pyramid schemes under the guise of mental health and alpha-isms. This book knows what it's about (which I love) and spells it out for you (which I don't love as much). I enjoyed sometimes how on-the-nose it could be, but sometimes it felt as if the story thought I was stupid. I wish it made me actually think a little more instead of just saying it straight-up. But if we're putting that aside, the strong clear-cut message works mostly in the book's favour. It never gets muddled up, it never veers off-track.

The writing style is a delightful fit for the vibe of the book. It's very witty, fast-paced, even a little immature at times in a good way. And funny! Some jokes really got me to laugh out loud. At the same time though, when it gets serious, it does it well. All the heavy moments really hit you even when the other parts are silly. It also feels very raw, and blunt, not mincing words at all. Like I said before, sometimes the directness annoyed me... but other times it felt absolutely perfect. I think it's that subtle difference between the cool atmospheric "beating me with a sledgehammer" and the frustrating "spoonfeeding me everything in the story".

The characters were interesting, especially the main character Brian. He and I have mostly nothing in common on paper but of course there are things about him that are painfully relatable. Having no sense of direction, wanting so badly to belong. His estrangement from his parents felt very real. Nik and Darby were cool, not the fullest characters ever but they were likeable and served their roles in the story well. Tyler was an absolute caricature, but that's not a negative. It fits because he's fallen for his own grift, and now it's his entire identity. He is nothing and no one outside of it. I also liked the decision to kill Mark off despite him being seemingly more sympathetic than Tyler, and how he finds it much harder than Brian to let go. Because he's been falling for it his whole life, because he's just weak and different (read: gay) enough to hold resentment for Tyler, but he has nowhere else to go and nothing else to believe in. Honestly, what an on-point representation of the little two-man cult that is their abusive bromance. That Tyler/Mark/Brian toxic yaoi triangle was so damn good.

On that note, the portrayals of toxic masculinity were pretty chilling. That's ultimately what the book is about and I hated every moment of it (in a good way). In the end Brian finds happiness in being open and "weak" with his friends instead of posturing with disgusting straight(ish) men, and it's cheesy, but it works.

There is one scene that I hate though, mostly as a personal thing. When Brian comes out to Nik and Darby about his lycanthropy and they go "Haha we know!". Oh my god. One of the tropes I absolutely hate the most, no matter if it's coming out as gay or as a werewolf or whatever. I can't even describe why I despise it, but the entire chapter I was wrinkling my nose in disgust. I would love this book 100% more if it had just gone through the simple matter of making Nik and Darby react, to be surprised by the fact that their best friend is a murderous monster and love him anyway, instead of pulling that cheap trick.

Anyway, I've seen some reviewers compare this to Fight Club, which is accurate. Fight Club mixed with a hefty dose of Mean Girls. That being said, I wish the story had went harder on this. There are woefully few scenes of their little fight club, and when it's there it mostly glosses over the violence. This is related to a deeper issue I have with the book which is that I wish it wasn't afraid to go a little grittier. It isn't a rating problem, as there are two sex scenes. And yet the violence in this book seems so muted. Maybe it's just my gore-loving self, but why shy away? Werewolves and violence are two things that are fundamentally inseparable, but as it is the supernatural part seems more like set dressing. It feels scared to go into bloody territory, when bloody territory should be a werewolf's bread and butter.

I guess my most major complaint about it was that it just didn't feel crazy enough. Was it fun and campy and awesome? Yes. Was it as insane and wacky and gorey as I expected from a book titled "Bored Gay Werewolf" with a cover in neon colours? No. The concept is amazing, everything is there to make it perfect for me, but the execution falls just a little short. I think I would love it a lot more if I hadn't been looking forward to it for a while.

That being said, it's still a fun read. It's easy to get through but doesn't lack in intelligent and relevant themes which it delivers clearly through a clever and funny character voice. I give it a 7.5/10!

"One of the men in the restaurant says something and everyone else at the table laughs. That used to be me, Brian thinks. He knows he'd never be welcome, but he wonders if he just stands there long enough whether he could gain some of that warmth, enough to light a candle. If he did, and he kept it close to his chest, his free hand cradling the flame, could it last through the night or would it go out just as he turns the corner to his apartment?"
valzhang: (kakania)
2025-12-12 11:03 pm

Reading thoughts: Mary Ventura and the Ninth Kingdom

My first foray into Sylvia Plath! I've heard good things about The Bell Jar (though I never particularly felt the desire to read it myself), so when I saw her name at the library and that pretty red and blue cover I thought I'd try this story out.

And I'm grateful I did! It was a great story, and wonderfully concise especially after the behemoth that was Anna Karenina. Mary Ventura and the Ninth Kingdom perfectly builds characters, creates an atmosphere, and conveys a plot all in the span of 40 pages.

Train stories are always a pleasure, and this one builds the vibe of it so well, even if in this case the train isn't just a setting but also an essential and core element of the story. The whole story reads like a dream, very surreal and absurd but no less gripping for it.

Initially I thought the ninth kingdom was a metaphor for death in general. But as I continued reading and neared the ending the picture that formed in my head was that the train and its ticket were suicide, that all of its passengers had killed themselves; and that the ninth kingdom was hell. The world that Mary emerges into at the end isn't the living world but rather heaven, or just another more ideal plane of existence, having successfully escaped the damnation of hell.

The train could also be, inversely, life. Considering it's Mary's parents who set her on the trip to the ninth kingdom to begin with, one could say it's more about deciding your own path in life... that instead of going to someone else's desired destination, Mary chooses for herself to escape, and she comes out of it on the other side happier.

Of course the book is very much up to interpretation though. It trusts its reader to make something out of it, which is something I enjoy. The writing style is lovely, so descriptive and atmospheric. The part leading up to Mary's escape, and her back-and-forth with the old lady, was very tense and well-written. Fast-paced as it is, it feels well built up to and appropriately exciting.

I do wish it was a bit more in-depth. If it had 10 or so more pages, I would've loved to read what Plath could've cooked up, perhaps more details that would lend itself to the picture in her head. Because while I did compliment its vagueness and how open to interpretation it was, I would have appreciated just a little more to chew on.

Regardless, what a brilliant story that gets an 8.5/10 from me.
valzhang: (makimaaa)
2025-12-12 01:27 am

Reading thoughts: Anna Karenina

I finished Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy today. What a ride... it feels strange to finally put a rest to the novel I've been painstakingly working through since March. I have a lot of thoughts.

Firstly, Anna and Vronsky; I don't care too much for them as a couple, to be honest. Or to be more accurate I never really saw them as a happy couple or ever rooted for them to be happily together. I really like Anna as her own character, Vronsky not so much, but together as lovers I struggle to see their chemistry and I never really delighted in their moments together. The fact that they love each other feels more told than it is shown. I have no idea whether this was the intention or not.

This in contrast to Kitty and Levin, who I liked very much. I think they're very sweet together. I love Kitty and how cheerful and enthusiastic she is. I especially enjoyed the middle chapters about her youth pre-marriage to Levin, she is just such a likeable character to follow and even from the beginning I felt very fond of her. I like Levin as well, partially maybe because I relate so much to him... I like that he's socially awkward, that he gets jealous easily, that he can at once be very knowledgeable but also clueless. I have to admit whenever the POV switched to Kitty or Levin, I internally cheered.

"Levin had by this time become accustomed to express his thoughts boldly, without troubling to put them into precise phraseology; he knew that at such loving moments as the present his wife would understand what he meant from a mere hint, and she did understand him."

I loved the scene where Levin visits his brother Nicholas as he dies, as morbid as it sounds. I like how much it shows off Kitty's strength, that she is the level-headed and active one in comparison to Levin. And I find it deeply relatable how Levin was always, of course, on some level aware of the concept of death, but it is through this death of someone close to him that he suddenly becomes truly awakened to what it is and that it exists.

That's not to say I didn't enjoy the Anna/Vronsky bits at all. All I wish is that I felt a little something more for them. But I still liked reading their chapters, especially toward the end as their relationship crumbled apart. (It's during these later chapters that I dislike Vronsky more and more, even if I do get that's the point).

One part that will especially stick with me is the scene where Anna is going to the station and she looks at the world around her and can only regard it with hate. When all the pain she's suffered has clouded her vision and she can no longer see any good in anything. Even where you might expect it, she finds a way to twist it into something ugly. It feels so human and real. And the last moment before her suicide where she sees the joy in the world once more, but it still doesn't stop her from killing herself, really strikes me. Again at the risk of sounding morbid, what an amazingly written death scene.

This book came with notes, ones that compared Levin and Vronsky, no doubt because they're both the "males" of the two main couples. But in my opinion, it feels more appropriate to compare Anna and Levin. Because they are the two main protagonists who we spend the most time with, yes, but also because the paralleling arcs feel to me centred around their inner world. Anna's search for passionate love, which ends in tragedy, against Levin's simple way of living and the hopeful note it ends on despite his numerous existential crises (though perhaps it would be more accurate to say this book is one singular long existential crisis for Levin). Regardless of whether it's luck or fate, Levin finds an answer to the question he asks, even if it's not an absolute one. Anna does not, or maybe she does but she cannot bring herself to live with it.

And I know some people say that Levin is the true protagonist, but I don't think that's true either... he seems more in-depth because he was in part Tolstoy's self-insert and thus a lot of his thoughts are the author's own, but I think they complete each other, much the way their stories do. Without one, the other one's symbolic autobiography is incomplete.

Other characters and aspects I liked were Dolly and Karenin. I thoroughly enjoyed Dolly's perspective whenever it switched to her, especially her views on motherhood and her own war with herself, admiring Anna for acting on her heart's desires, something Dolly could not do. I think it's a really realistic depiction of these two noblewomen stuck in an oppressive society. Karenin's chapters were sometimes more boring I admit, but I do enjoy that Tolstoy also made him a sympathetic character. The tone of his narrative was robotic and unfeeling and it really fit Karenin's own personality.

When it comes to writing style, I like how realistic it feels. This may just be the general state of Russian literature at the time, but it feels distinct from Dostoevsky... I can't put my finger on it, but it's there. It tells us through excruciating detail every single feeling and thought a character has. It makes you feel like you know the characters so intimately. Of course this does result in lots of meandering, chapters upon chapters focused on just one happening, and I don't blame anyone who may find it a bit of a slog (I too got a bit frustrated in the less interesting chapters), but in the end I think it's mostly a plus of the novel. They feel like real people that could have existed.

Related to that, I do have mixed feelings on how absurdly long this book is. As I've seen many people point out, I feel like this book could convey much the same message and characters while being 200 pages shorter. This is my main gripe with the book, that there are many chapters that feel too boring, superfluous even. But also, I don't know that I would feel as deeply about it in the end if it lacked pages upon pages of detail and character study and thought. So while I do wish it was easier to read and more concise with what it was trying to say, I also can't say concretely "Man, Tolstoy should've written this way shorter". It probably wouldn't be Tolstoy in that case xd.

I feel that there's a lot in this book that I missed largely because I'm totally ignorant when it comes to Russian history and politics, which is a shame and probably contributed to me not being entertained as I could have been. I also think I would understand it better and be able to pick up on more of its intended themes if I reread it. But 800 pages... if I ever end up giving it a second read, it'll be a long time from now.

Overall, I liked it. It was a good read, especially toward the end when everything started to come together. I devoured the last 300 pages in less than a week! If you can get past its intimidating length and the fact that it's very much a product of its time with its commentary on Russian society and philosophy, I would recommend it. A solid 7.5/10!

"I shall still get angry with Ivan the coachman in the same way, shall dispute in the same way, shall inopportunely express my thoughts; there will still be a wall between my soul's holy of holies and other people; even my wife I shall still blame for my own fears and shall repent of it. My reason will still not understand why I pray, but I shall still pray, and my life, my whole life, independently of anything that may happen to me, is every moment of it no longer meaningless as it was before, but has an unquestionable meaning of goodness with which I have the power to invest it."